official web-site
November 22, 2008


November 2008
     1
2
34567
8
9
1011121314
15
16
171819202122
23
2425262728
29
30




Our banner:
Mikhail Khodorkovsky Press-center

Let's support children from Podmoskovny Lyceum

Mikhail Khodorkovsky's Lawyer Robert Amsterdam Blog

Info re. Alexanyan's case

Committee to Free Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky & Platon L. Lebedev

White Paper On Abuse Of State Authority In The Russian Federation

Alexey Pichugin case

"Sovest" Group

"Sovest" Group Campaign for Granting Political Prisoner Status to Mikhail Khodorkovsky




Rambler's Top100
Rambler's Top100



Ðåéòèíã@Mail.ru




Provided by Pogoda.Ru.Net

read more »

read more »

September 9, 2005

Lawyers for Mikhail Khodorkovsky filed two additional appeals in connection with charges relating to NIUIF and the special tax zone Lesnoy.

The Lesnoy appeal states that “…the court unlawfully and without any grounds found Khodorkovsky guilty under Articles 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.” The appeal unequivocally asserts:

1. No theft, i.e. illegal uncompensated seizure of a third party’s property to the benefit of the defendant and at the expense of the owner, has been perpetrated by anyone, because:

A) in effect, taxes were overpaid;
B) overpayment was made in monetary instruments (redeemed promissory notes), and the documents which support this fact have not been refuted by the court or invalidated by any other agency;
C) under Article 78 of the Tax Code, the overpayment margin was to be returned;
D) no losses, particularly the incorrectly calculated ones, were inflicted on the state;
E) no one committed any fraudulent acts.

2. Khodorkovsky’s involvement in all the events covered by these charges has been disproved. The case file contains no evidence that would point to an organized group that purportedly committed the fraud.

3. Furthermore, the legal evaluation of the actions imputed to the defendant contradicts Article 10 of the CC, i.e. the court has applied the law on criminal acts erroneously.

Regarding the NIUIF charges, the attorneys believe that “the part of the sentence that declares Khodorkovsky guilty of defrauding NIUIF is unlawful and groundless and should be annulled; the criminal proceedings against Khodorkovsky under these charges should be terminated because:

A) the evidence was procured in gross violation of the law, and criminal proceedings for these charges were not backed by a criminal lawsuit;
B) the instance of fraud as well as constituent elements of this offense are missing;
C) Khodorkovsky’s involvement in any activities related to the transfer of title to the said stake in NIUIF from the RFPF (acting on behalf of the state) to AOZT Wallton has not been established.”



Ðóññêàÿ âåðñèÿ


According to the sentence of
the Moscow City Court,
Mikhail Khodorkovsky
will be released in
1066 days

DAYS IN CUSTODY:
Mikhail Khodorkovsky 1854
Platon Lebedev 1969
Svetlana Bakhmina 1446

Search